Document Verifier

A platform that enhances the reliability of educational certifications in Singapore by allowing users to view and check the authenticity of verifiable certificates.

Company

Accredify

Project duration

2 weeks (2021)

Team members

1 lead UI / UX Designer (me)
1 UI / UX Designer

Context

Accredify is a start-up with a main focus in the education sector, it provides institutions a way to create, issue and manage digital documents that are verifiable.

Students who receive their verifiable certificates can share it with potential employers to view and check the authenticity of the certificates. The Document Verifiable tool verifies authenticity by checking 4 aspects:

  • Contents of the document has not been tampered with

  • Document is issued by a recognised institution

  • Document is not revoked by the issuing institution

  • Document has not expired

The challenge

At the start of the project, we spoke to the Account Managers and Customer Support team to understand the feedback our clients had for our initial design. The key take away:

Important information was either missing, hard to find, or confusing.

Besides important information that were hidden, users had a hard time understanding the jargons used and found it difficult to customise what they wanted to share with others. As such, we risked losing clients who were looking at alternatives that better suited their needs.

Research goals

  • Understand the student’s motivations on the platform

  • Identify frustrations encountered when viewing and sharing documents

  • Identify opportunities that would aid students in their job search

  • Analyse features offered by our competitors

What’s available in the market?

Our main competitors, Accredible and Credly, operate in the educational sector and offer more extensive features.

Interviewing users

Diving deeper into the problem space, we interviewed 5 fresh graduates from different institutions to learn about:

  • How do fresh graduates prepare for job applications?

  • What do they wish to achieve on the platform?

  • What are the important information they wish to see on the platform?

  • What information do users want to share with potential employers?

Notes and observations recorded and grouped in an Affinity Map

The user interviews revealed 4 key insights:

LinkedIn is the go-to platform for applications

To keep their LinkedIn profiles updated, users expect to share their certificates to the platform easily.

Flexibility in choosing what to share

Since certificates contain private information, users need a simple way to choose what they share with employers.

Verification details should be clear and concise

There are too many verification information and it should be simpler and more straightforward.

Interest in upskilling to remain competitive

Users would find more value in the platform if it offers suggestions on potential courses they could take next.

Framing the challenge

Following the user interviews, we spoke to our product and engineering team to share our findings with them. After estimating the resources available and confirming product directions, we decided to deprioritise course recommendations in this session and explore this feature in a future phase.

We crafted 2 HMW statements that would guide our brainstorming session:

How might we...

Help users share their verifiable certificates easily while protecting their privacy?

  1. Help users share their verifiable certificates easily while protecting their privacy?

  2. Improve the clarity of information to help users understand it easily?

Improve the clarity of information to help users understand it easily?

Brainstorming & Dot Voting

Participants were given 10 minutes to produce as many ideas as they could. They were reminded to keep an open mind as there are no bad ideas, to be positive and to aim for quantity instead of quality.

After the first brainstorming session, participants were given time to explain what they’ve written and look through ideas provided by others. Another 5 minutes was allocated to allow participants to build on the ideas from others.

At the end of the session, each participant were given a number of votes to assign to their preferred ideas. Voting was done privately to avoid persuaded voting and group voting.

Creating wire flows & validating solution

Once we had a better understanding of the problem and ideas on how to solve them, we rolled up our sleeves and quickly mocked up a few wireframes to visualise and validate the solution.

A version of the wire frames we did

With the wireframes on hand, we first consulted a few developers to ensure that the solution was technically feasible. Afterwards, we conducted 5 usability testing sessions to validate whether the new designs would solve the users’ problems.

As the facilitator for the session, I prepared some scenarios and tasks for the users to perform and observed how the users interacted with the wire frames. From the sessions, we observed:

Improved information structure

The new presentation and categorisation of details helped users to find and understand information easily.

Information is more concise

Users were pleased to see just enough pertinent information without being overwhelmed by excessive details.

Customising information to share is straightforward

Users could navigate through the share settings smoothly without any help and expressed that the process is intuitive.

Adding to LinkedIn profile is the most common action

We noticed that all users wanted to add the certificates to their LinkedIn profiles instead of posting it.

Negative sentiments towards “Sharing disabled”

Most users felt frustrated when they noticed sharing is disabled and wanted to know the reason behind it.

The term “Issuance details” is confusing

Users expected to see information about the issuing institution rather than verification details.

Crafting high fidelity designs

Using the insights gathered from the usability testing sessions, we crafted the high fidelity mockups with handover notes for developers, including designs for various breakpoints to ensure web responsiveness.

Additionally, we incorporated our new style guides and design system into our designs to ensure visual consistency across all our product offerings.

Outcomes and next steps

Although we would love to see our designs come to live, a change in direction required the teams to prioritise other projects instead.

That being said, once the design is live, I’d iterate the process and:

  • Conduct a second round of user testing to identify active usability issues

  • Explore the possibility of providing course recommendations for our users

  • Identify other opportunities to improve on the product for our users

Other works

Patient Referral

Reimagining the referral workflow between GPs and specialists at Tan Tock Seng Hospital.

View work

SCDF TruCerts

A unified platform to issue and manage verifiable fire safety products certificates.

View work

Let’s Connect

It doesn’t just end here — Feel free to reach out for any opportunities or even just to bounce around ideas. 😊

Let’s connect